Existing-building commissioning
Median primary-energy savings by programme type: 5% utility programmes; 9% monitoring-based utility programmes; 14% outside utility programmes.
Commissioning costs and savings — LBNL, 2020 ↗UNDERSTAND · STRENGTHEN · MODERNISE
Connect asset knowledge, engineering assessment and operating information to improve reliability, investigate waste and plan the next investment.
POWER · ASSETS · INTELLIGENCE
Grid. Solar. Generation. UPS. Distribution. Building services. Production.
Normal supply paths – – Standby connection Illustrative architecture; configuration varies by site.
CLOSE THE LOOP
Connect the observed issue to its cause, the agreed work and a measured result.
Illustrative experience, not a live monitoring service. Coverage is scoped to installed meters, available controls, protocols and data access. Existing specialist controls retain their role.
PUBLISHED EVIDENCE / CLEAR CONTEXT
Median primary-energy savings by programme type: 5% utility programmes; 9% monitoring-based utility programmes; 14% outside utility programmes.
Commissioning costs and savings — LBNL, 2020 ↗Median annual energy savings reported in the commercial-building analytics campaign. Analysis must lead to corrective action.
Proving the business case for building analytics — LBNL, 2020 ↗Guide benchmark for routine maintenance: repair leaks, review pressure and maintain filters. Applies to compressed air, not the whole facility.
Compressed-air efficiency reference guide — Natural Resources Canada ↗Published benchmarks from different systems and populations. They are not additive, Voltanor project results or guaranteed savings. Site evidence determines the opportunity.
Survey assets and reconcile available drawings, equipment references and site observations. Build or update an asset register, single-line diagrams and digital representations suited to the facility.
Review critical loads, distribution arrangements, backup supply and equipment condition in the context of business continuity. Define targeted investigations and a prioritised improvement plan.
Investigate resource use and equipment behaviour alongside production, occupancy and schedules. Explore avoidable consumption, operating mismatches and improvement opportunities.
Assess upgrades, additional loads and on-site energy options against existing constraints. Compare technical alternatives and sequence the work around operating requirements.
PUT THE OPPORTUNITY IN CONTEXT
Explore a simple energy-cost scenario. Choose a saving assumption for an agreed scope; this is a planning illustration, not an audit forecast.
Calculation: annual cost × selected reduction. Assumes unchanged unit energy cost. Excludes investment, financing, demand charges, tariff changes and interactions between measures.
$90,000 remaining annual energy cost
Measure the baseline. Define the intervention. Price the work. Verify the effect under comparable conditions.
Explore the assessment journey ↗START SMALL. BUILD A USEFUL FOUNDATION.
A missing drawing, a repeated interruption or an unexplained load can provide a focused starting point. Agree the question first, then the evidence and work needed to answer it.